Saturday, February 27, 2010

Semi-Final Pairings, Malaysian Women Masters 2010

As posted previously, three players easily managed to qualify to the semi-finals, which included Nurul Huda, Fong Mi Yen and Alia Anin Azwa bt Bakri.

image image

Pix 1. Nur Nabila.                       Pix 2. Nurul Huda.

 

image  image

Pix 3. Fong Mi Yen.                    Pix 4. Alia Anin Azwa.

The last slot of the semi-finals had to go through an additional hurdle of playing two rapid games tonight, 27th February 2010 at the DATCC to determine the fourth candidate to the semi-finals.

As the results show in the table summary below, Nur Nabila bt Azman Hisham prevailed by drawing the first rapid game and winning the second game against Khairunnisa Wahiduddin.

image

For the Semi-Finals tomorrow, 28th February 2010, first board will played by Nurul Huda against Nur Nabila Azman Hisham and on second board by Fong Mi Yen against Alia Anin Azwa bt Bakri.

For me and a few others, we will be playing in the University Malaya Team Open Tun Syed Zaharuddin at the Ninth College, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur held tomorrow, 28th February 2010.

We wish the best of luck to the last four winning Semi-Finalists!

(source of results: Najib Wahab)

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Congrats to both players, the result had shown that top 2 players based on the National Rating moves into the Final. This showed that National Rating is far more accurate than elo rating when comes to determine who are the better players.

With these results, it further strengthen the ideas made by cetain people over the past 2 weeks in calling for the used of Nat Rating as a benchmark for selection. I too support the idea that players with National Rating above 1500 only should be chosen.

For information, it was published in Nat Rating List that Nat Rating is 200 to 250 points lesser than elo rating (In general, among active players who can participate "as active" in FIDE event as per local events). Example, if one player with FIDE elo 1500 should have a comparative rating strength of 1250 to 1300 Nat Rating. Does that mean we should still gives priority to those who possess "weak" elo rating?

Nowadays elo rating starts from 1400, maybe one day is 1200. A person who did not have elo Rating because he/she did not take part in enough FIDE-rated events, it does not represent he/she is weaker than those priviledge regulars in FIDE-rated events.